Rae Armantrout
Rae Armantrout was born in 1947 in
The "Language Poets" are considered to be the most prominent group of American post-modern poets, with Armantrout as their most lyric representative. Her poems deal with the phrasal nature of the symbolic system of language, which she encounters with cautious suspicion because it reproduces and confirms a morally dubious reality.
"I think that if I didn't write against norms, I wouldn't be writing", says Armantrout, who also describes her work as a "focus on the interventions of capitalism into consciousness".
At the same time the poet scrutinises her own language and thereby performs a deconstructive process. In her short and meticulously combined poems she mixes different levels of language, alienates quotations, stages provocative coincidences as well as linguistic accidents, and composes very obvious punchlines.
As a result of this style, her texts are jolty, heterogeneous and opaque. The surprising changes in the short lines of the poems, which are written in everyday speech, also inhibit the readibility and lead to a challenging ambiguity. Her first volume of poems "Extremities" (1978) has so far been followed up by seven further collections concerned with the construction of femininity and the question of beauty, and the themes of time and memory.
In 1998 her prose memoir "True", which demonstrates Armantrout's narrative talent, was published. In "Veil" (2001) new poems are combined with poems from previous collections such as "The Invention of Hunger" (1979), "Precedence" (1985), "Made to Seem" (1995) and "The Pretext" (2001).
Armantrout has been awarded the Fund for Poetry Award twice. She was given a California Arts Council Fellowship and was Writer in Residence at
Rae Armantrout
" Many teachers see poetry as containing specific ingredients -- deeper meanings, symbolic meanings, they can ask questions like "Here's a symbol, what does the symbol mean?" Many teachers want their students to be able to identify known literary devices and ask how those known literary devices are working in the poem. And that's understandable, because it's something that we all know how to do -- we've been trained to do that.
"Poetry like mine maybe doesn't contain those expected literary devices. While I think my own poetry contains a lot of metaphor, it tends to be as much anti-metaphor as metaphor. It's kind of like I'm setting two metaphors off against each other, or just seeing how far you can stretch a metaphor before it breaks. When I teach a more experimental work, I ask the question "What is it doing?" more than "What does it mean?"
"I ask "What patterns do you see?" I think that's a good way to begin, with anything unknown. When I give my students a text, especially a more experimental text, I start by asking "What do you notice?" Avant-garde doesn't have to be scary -- it can even be populist. Think about Ron Silliman, who would chant his poems on the public bus system in